CBS: Women Vaccinated with Gardasil more likely to be infected with High Risk HPV says study

25
22,441 views
Vaccinated with Gardasil

Women who receive the Gardasil (HPV) vaccine may be more likely to be infected with the higher-risk strains of the virus than women who do not get the vaccine, according to a new study. But not to worry, you just have to get(you guessed it) more shots and you’ll survive(or so they hope)! 

Keep reading! We have quotes from CBS and the study for all those who keep doubting this and wondering why their doctors push a dangerous vaccine on them!

Vaccinated with Gardasil

We go on a trip to Southern California this weekend to speak in front of a bunch of Health Nuts (over 3,000 of them!)only to find out the Gardasil conference was held at the same time at the same hotel(for Merck). I will not comment on the attitude or health of the Gardasil folks who attended the Gardasil Merck conference, but it wasn’t pretty.

Now I get home from my second cross country flight in 3 days only to see what I missed in national news. Did you (or your daughter, niece etc) get vaccinated with the Gardasil vaccine? Well, if they did, they might be more likely to get those high risk strains( the dangerous ones that can kill) of the disease but all they have to do is come in and get another shot to fix it(sarcasm). The stupidity here amazes me. No surprise Live Science doesn’t even mention that they can be more likely to get a high risk strain (which could lead to death) but instead Live Science puts in their headline that they need another shot which is apparently what Merck is recommending.

The arrogance of that headline kills me. Talk about irresponsible. Then again one of the current heads of Merck used to be to be head of the CDC. Talk about corruption! Merck and the CDC are so dirty you don’t have to dig far to find the skeletons.

From the CBS article:

“Women who receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine may be more likely to be infected with certain high-risk strains of the virus than women who do not get the vaccine, according to a new study.

The findings suggest that, although the vaccine is effective in protecting against four strains of HPV, women who received it may still benefit from getting another, recently approved HPV vaccine that protects against nine strains of the virus, the researchers said.”

Gee, that’s just what I want to hear after I get my child vaccinated with numerous Gardasil vaccines, (which even CBS reported a Gardasil researcher warned can be hazardous for your health– turns out she was right!)MORE shots. They have gotten themselves in quite the clusterf*ck here. But instead, the “skeptics”(we’re the real skeptics of this obviously dangerous vaccine)are posting in a rage about Chipotle Grill going GMO Free(great job Chipotle!). These “skeptics”, who push Monsanto and Gardasil on us and laugh at us for questioning GMOs, are suddenly silent with no mention of this latest scandal with Gardasil. I’m sure they’ll continue to give their kids the Gardasil vaccine. Wait, will the current vaccine be updated since it can put girls at risk? I don’t even want to know. I wouldn’t wish this injection on my worst enemy.

I have a friend whose daughter was about to get married. She was in mid 20s and her doctor pushed the Gardasil shot harder than a crack dealer on them. The daughter was already living with her fiancee and explained to the doctor that they were monogamous, why would she need the vaccine? The doctors are no better than the “Pusherman” described in Curtis’ Mayfield’s song from the Superfly soundtrack (which coincidentally came out the same year I was hospitalized and nearly died from vaccines as an infant). You might think that’s a stretch there but doctors have been more “sick care” providers for some time just giving their “patients” the drug ads they see and crave on TV… the US is the only country(besides New Zealand)that even allows these pharmaceutical ads on the tely. I love how they say all the side effects at the end very quickly. As if they read them quickly enough they might not happen to you. Perhaps they should be forced to read them in slo mo or show the people in hospitals(or their gravestones)who did suffer those side effects- especially the Gardasil girls. What a tragedy. If it weren’t so awful it would almost read like a comedy. I hope this isn’t swept under the rug as it’s the future generations we’re talking about. Just do a search to see the news articles of the countless girls who have died or were injured from Gardasil. Then you can decide what you want to do. For me, the decision is easy.

Source for those trying to deny it: CBS NEWS link which shows that Gardasil victims could be more likely to get high risk deadly strains of HPV than females who got NO shot at all. 

Follow US

Erin Elizabeth

ABOUT THE FOUNDER OF HEALTH NUT NEWS

Erin Elizabeth is a long time activist with a passion for the healing arts, working in that arena for a quarter century. Her site HealthNutNews.com is less than 2 years old but has already cracked the top 20 Natural Health sites worldwide. She is an author, public speaker, and has recently done some TV and film programs for some of her original work which have attracted international media coverage. You can get Erin’s free e-book here and also watch a short documentary on how she overcame vaccine injuries, Lyme disease, significant weight gain, and more. Follow Erin on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram.

P.S. You can subscribe to her Youtube Channel for breaking news, free blenders, giveaways and more
Follow US

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

  • I specialize in things that people know but do not know that they know it. When you ask the question people do not have a clue to the answer. But when you tell them the answer, they say that they knew that. For example I asked some UPenn students what is in food that you need to eat for health but your body gets rid of it. They say that makes no sense. If your body gets rid of it, then it does not need it. I say yes that the body gets rid of it but you need to eat it for health. They say that is ridiculous. Then when I say fiber, they say of course that is the case with fiber.
    So here is a question for you. They estimate that 40% of medications or drugs are to treat what. What are 40% of the medications used to treat? Any guesses on what it can be. You know this but don’t know that you know this. The answer is ridiculous, but true so people do not think of it. The answer is an estimated 40% of medications are to treat the side effects of other medications. Here is another one. What country has a population of about 1,000 men, but no women. That sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? The answer is the Vatican City with cardinals, bishops and priests.

  • Heather DeVies-Enders

    Yeah, because I didn’t get sick enough the first time around. I’m not signing up for round 2, I’d rather risk death. Yes, the first one was THAT bad.

  • Heather, I’m so sorry and hope you are alright. I hear this from young women every day. I hope you’re doing better now and I wouldn’t recommend this vaccine to my worst enemy ox (if I had one!)

  • aprilktutor

    Erin, can you include a link to the study in question?

  • Freedom Elf

    While I agree totally with the writer of the above article, the fact that it is written in an amateurish, “OH MY GOD!” style with superlatives and expletives built in, makes it more difficult for mainstream America to get on board and realize what a serious problem this is. Next time, try not to sound like a high schooler in order to inform the widest possible audience.

  • This is a blog. Not the New York Times. Though they (The NY Times) are writing me this week, using me as a source for their stories, and my site (since i wrote this) hit the top 20 health sites in the world, so point taken. I only started my blog 21 months ago and didn’t expect it to go viral. The info is here though and my partner of 6 yrs- Dr. Mercola- and I know how dangerous Gardasil is.

  • Hi April out for my birthday early dinner, but the CBS link right up top all in blue should have all the study links and info you should need. It was on the front of CBS and in the news too. This was mainstream. Feel free to click and see 🙂 E

  • Susanna Strandberg

    side effects from other drugs

  • guest

    Right on Erin!!! You both are doing a fantastic job! I’ve been recommending your sites for a while now! You go girl?

  • thanks 😉 I Just re read my blog post and actually it never said OMG and I thought it was a half way decent social commentary! No I’m not the NY Times, but then again people will always be critical. I’ll resort to old English next time “Thou Shall Not get the Gardasil vaccine unless thou wants to increase the chance of cancer (which was rare back when Old English was actually used : )

  • MissEcoGlam

    I’m so sorry too. I hope you are receiving help for your health problems?

  • AutismDad

    There are nasty Trolls on these forums who never say anything positive. Its them, not you.

  • AutismDad

    Yea the “EXPERTS” at MERCK have another profit driven idea for KA-CHING!

  • transportjohnny

    Unfortunately, this is very prevalent. Sorry to hear this. Hope you are doing better.

    My kids will NOT be getting the Gardasil vaccine.

  • Prefabfan

    Sounds like medicine has cured a horrible disease with the total cost to patients of two shots, and the flat earth society is still warning the sky will fall if young ladies are allowed to have medicine that makes sex safer.

  • Prefabfan

    Did you have your complaints examined by a reputible doctor or hospital? What did they say?

  • Paula

    Wow, I just can’t believe how many girls and women I am hearing about getting so sick from this shot. My daughter being one of them! They tried to tell me “it’s just a virus”. Thank god I went with my motherly instincts and didn’t let them push more on her, nor will my youngest be receiving ANY.
    I would like to know if there is any lasting illness or effects after receiving this shot and being so sick. Any suggestions aside from getting “more shots”?

  • jake

    “Thou Shall Not get the Gardasil vaccine unless thou wants to increase the chance of cancer”

    1. Over 90% of cervical cancer cases are caused by HPV.

    2. This new Gardasil 9 that you are bashing confers immunity to strains implicated in 85-90% of HPV-induced cervical cancer, up from 70% (still a great number) in the quadrivalent Gardasil vaccine.

    3. 90% of 85-90% = 76.5%-81%

    4. There were 12,900 new cases of cervical cancer last year and 4,100 deaths. While about 90% of patients whose cancer is caught in Stage 1 survive, that still means 10% do not. However, a large number of these cancers aren’t caught until Stage 3, at which point only about 1/3 of patients survive.

    5. Assuming all 12,900 of 2015’s new cases were caught at the earliest stage, that is still 1,290 people who will die. If caught at Stage 3 or worse, a full 4,300 of those people will die. Using the stats from Fact #3 above, between 9,868-10,449 of these new cases could have been prevented by a vaccine covering 85-90% of carcinogenic HPV strains. Assuming 90% survival at Stage 1, this decreased incidence would save about 1000 lives. Assuming 30% survival at Stage 3 or later, this would save about 3000 lives. Obviously, not all cases would be Stage 1 nor would all cases be Stage 3+, so we would fall somewhere between 1000-3000 lives saved out of this group. The numbers of ~12,000 new cases and ~4,000 deaths from cervical cancer has remained steady for quite a while, so it can be assumed safely that Gardasil 9 would save approximately 1000-3000 lives every year.

    I genuinely wonder how you sleep at night. Do you genuinely believe the nonsense you are spewing about “Thou Shall Not get the Gardasil vaccine unless thou wants to increase the chance of cancer”? I sincerely hope so, because the alternative is that you are willfully promoting a belief that, if everybody fell for this garbage, would cost 1000-3000 lives each and every year.

  • I’m sorry for your reading comprehension skills or lack thereof. But you must be in denial of the science that explains they’re more likely to get the cancer causing HPV strains if they’ve have the shot than those who haven’t. When you can read and lose the attitude you’re welcome back on my site. Until then- sounds like you’re in the flat earth society. We here believe in science.

  • Sandy Calvano

    This article is written irresponsibly and with little merit and understanding. The writer is not a health care professional or researcher and is based solely on her opinion and personal understanding which obviously lacks knowledge and expertise. The vaccine does not cause a person to get other strains of hpv, it protects against contracting specific ones (the initial vaccine protected against 4 strains of hpv and the newer vaccine protects against 9 strains). There are numerous HPV strains. HPV is contracted by skin to skin contact only and sexually transmittable. If people are getting HPV after receiving the vaccine, they are likely getting the strains which are not covered by the vaccine. Some people have the belief that they are no longer susceptible to getting HPV after getting the vaccine, which is wrong. Also, some women believe they no longer have to get the pap test done if they have received the vaccine, which is wrong. If this is your belief, then definitely you will be more susceptible contract and harbor a strain of HPV, which, if goes untreated, may eventually turn into a cervical cancer. Do not blame a vaccine for this, this would be directly attributed to ones lack of knowledge about the need to continue regular pap smears throughout an individual’s life. Also, if a person has developed a high grade dysplasia, vaccines are not, nor ever have been a treatment, they are a protector of developing a future infection of only specific strains, so if a woman does not take responsibility and have her dysplasia treated by not showing up to followups or procedures, then they definitely increase their chances of developing a cervical cancer. Although, this article is in an interesting read, the writer is not an educated health care professional nor I cannot seem to find any professional designation. She is a self described “health care nut” and “public speaker” who has issue with vaccines period. This is an important issue in health care, and this website needs to provide readers articles written by responsible and reliable professionals, not articles from non professional opinions. I can find baseless opinions anywhere. There are different websites for that.

  • Oh Sandy are you trying to libel me? Perhaps you were taking so much time trolling my old articles and spreading disinformation (do they pay you for that?) That you obviously failed to read the actual study. Heck, even the study shows that “Women who receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine may be more likely to be infected with certain high-risk strains of the virus than women who do not get the vaccine, according to a new study.” and no Sandy, Sarah would not have had the “NEW” vaccine back when she was vaccinated. This is not opinion. This is fact. Many women who get the vaccine are then becoming infected with the high risk strains of HPV and then (Surprise) they get cervical cancer. Sadly Chemotherapy didn’t save Sarah and she died. Another thing, while you attempt to insult me – you look really foolish. Because as of March 2015 I have never sold anything in life. So really? Your whole argument is moronic and no wonder it’s been reported so many times today as “troll alert” Please, go troll another page. thanks. Link to CBS is right at the bottom of the page.

  • Jeremy Berryman

    You might be the smartest person on this site.

  • Jeremy Berryman

    You really DON’T believe in science. You quote ONE study that shows there MAY be a correlation, and that this COULD happen. Correlation doesn’t equal causation. If it was up to people like you, well, the ‘good old days’ of plagues and pestilence would still be around.

  • Jeremy Berryman

    “may be more likely…” And the world MAY end tomorrow. You’re selling fear, not reality.

  • Michelle Walters

    You obviously run a very biased discussion only allowing people who actually support your biased view. Shame on you.